Central Iowa Water Report yields public outcry - and EPA answers by delisting polluted rivers8/10/2025
Story and video from Iowa Environmental Council, August 2025
In addition to the presentation, Adam Shriver from the Harkin Institute was interviewed by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) to discuss the implications of the CISWRA report, "In Iowa, there's this big elephant in the room, which is that we're the number one leading state in confined animal feeding operations for hogs and for battery cage chickens." Shriver continues, "And also that we're the state that applies the most amount of synthetic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers." Stay tuned to the Harkin Institute and IEC, who are planning more ways for people to stay involved in this conversation moving forward.
What is the Impaired Waters List?
Under the Clean Water Act, every state must adopt water quality standards that define how it would like to use its waters and the pollution levels that would prevent those uses. When a water does not meet the standards and is too dirty for one of its intended uses, it is “impaired.” Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to submit a list to EPA once every two years identifying impaired waters that need a plan to reduce pollution. EPA must approve or disapprove the list. Iowa DNR submitted its list in 2024 with 705 impairments. States must develop a water improvement plan for each waterbody on the impaired waters list and submit them for EPA approval. The plans must identify sources of pollution and the amount of pollution reduction needed to meet the water quality standard and protect the designated uses. The reductions are incorporated into permits for point sources, such as wastewater treatment facilities, but are not required for nonpoint sources, such as agriculture. "Efforts to de-list Iowa waterbodies for nitrate are clearly misguided. This action undermines the public process and the public trust in the agencies charged with keeping our water clean. The public already had opportunity to comment and overwhelmingly supported the listing that reflected real-life conditions in these rivers,” says Michael Schmidt, IEC General Counsel. MARY ELLEN - I WILL TAKE OUT THIS PARAGRAPH AND REPLACE IT WITH A QUOTE FROM YOU, SHOULD YOU BE WILLING TO PROVIDE ONE. IT WOULD GO INTO A PARAGRAPH SOMETHING LIKE FOLLOWS.... What does this mean for these delisted rivers ? LWV UMRR Chair, Mary Ellen Miller, says...>>>>>>>>>> Comments are closed.
|
| LWV Upper Mississippi River Region | UMRR blog |
RSS Feed